Computer Science ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 190-196.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.200500023

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Humans-Cyber-Physical Ontology Fusion of Industry Based on Representation Learning

YANG Ru-han, DAI Yi-ru, WANG Jian, DONG Jin   

  1. College of Electronics and Information Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China
  • Received:2020-05-07 Revised:2020-08-15 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-05-09
  • About author:YANG Ru-han,born in 1996,postgra-duate.Her main research interests include ontology construction and fusion.(15061882107@163.com)
    DAI Yi-ru,born in 1972,associate researcher.Her main research interests include systems engineering and so on.
  • Supported by:
    National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China(2018AAA0101800).

Abstract: With the development of the new generation of artificial intelligence technology,the manufacturing system has deve-loped from the humans-physical binary system to the humans-cyber-physical triad system,and the multivariate data fusion across domains and layers has become an inevitable trend.As a conceptual model capable of describing data semantically,ontologies are widely used for integration,sharing and reuse of multiple heterogeneous data.In traditional industries,research on using ontology fusion to drive data fusion typically focuses on information and physical systems.In order to solve the problem of humans-cyber-physical ontology fusion,an improved representation learning model TransHP is proposed in this paper.The classical translation model does not effectively use information other than the structure of the triad,TransHP makes improvements based on TransH,and elements in the ontology constitute the type triad and the instance triad.In the TransHP,first,for the type triad,the structure and properties of the triad are used for joint training.Next,the vector representations of the obtained type entities are used as the input of the training instance vectors,and the structure information of the instance is used for joint training,while the confidence level is added as the relational strength calculation to solve the problem of the disorderly distribution of entities in semantic space caused by the sparsity of the relational triad.In this paper,a human subject ontology is constructed as an example of a hot-rolling production process in an industrial field and tested as a small sample,and the experimental result shows that the TransHP model infers a richer and more accurate relationship between entities in the human subject ontology compared with the TransH model.The fusion of humans-cyber-physical ontologies has been realized through the TransHP model,which solves the problem of humans-cyber-physical information interaction and paves the way for collaborative decision-making.

Key words: Entity alignment, Humans-cyber-physical data, Knowledge inference, Ontology fusion, Representation learning

CLC Number: 

  • TP181
[1]WANG B C,ZANG J Y,QU X M,et al.Research on New-Generation Intelligent Manufacturing based on Human-Cyber-Physical Systems [J].Engineering Sciences,2018,20(4):29-34.
[2]MAEDCHE A,STAAB S.Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web[J].Intelligent Systems IEEE,2001,16(2):72-79.
[3]BORDES A,USUNIER N,GARCIA-DURAN A,et al.Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of International conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.Lake Tahoe:Curran Associates Inc,2013:2787-2795.
[4]WANG Z,ZHANG J,FENG J,et al.Knowledge graph embedding by translating onhyperplanes [C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Menlo Park,CA:AAAI Press,2014:1112-1119.
[5]KAMIL S,GRZEGORZ D.Grounding of Human Observations as Uncertain Knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Computational Science.Berlin,Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag,2008:555-563.
[6]XIONG S,LIU P Z,SU Z Y,et al.Research on the Geographic Information Ontology Fusion Method Basedon Mapping of Semantic Matching[J].Geomatics Science and Engineering,2017(1):51-58.
[7]NATALYA F,MUSEN M A.The PROMPT suite:interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2003,59(6):983-1024.
[8]DOAN A,MADHAVAN J,DHAMANKAR R,et al.Learning to Map Ontologies on the Semantic Web[J].The VLDB Journal,2003,12:303-319.
[9]QU Y Z,HU W,CHENG G.Constructing Virtual Documents for Ontology Matching[C]//Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web.Edinburgh:Association for Computing Machinery,2006:23-31.
[10]ZHANG Y,ZHANG F,YAO P,et al.Name Disambiguation in AMiner:Clustering,Maintenance,and Human in the Loop[C]//Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining.London:Association for Computing Machinery,2018:1002-1011.
[11]BENGI O,YOSHU A,COURVILL E,et al.RepresentationLearning:A Review and New Perspectives[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,2013,35(8):1798-1828.
[12]LIU Z Y,SUN M S,LIN Y K,et al.Knowledge Representation Learning:A ReView[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2016,53(2):247-261.
[13]BORDES A,WESTON J,COLLOBERT R,et al.Learningstructured embeddings of knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.San Francisco:AAAI Press,2011:301-306.
[14]BORDES A,GLOROT X,WESTON J,et al.A semantic ma-tching energy function for learning with multi-relational data[J].Machine Learning,2014,94 (2):233-259.
[15]SOCHER R,CHEN D,MANNING C D,et al.Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of International conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.New York:Curran Associates Inc,2013:926-934.
[16]LIN Y,LIU Z,SUN M,et al.Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Texas:AAAI Press,2015:2181-2187.
[17]JI G,HE S,XU L,et al.Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix[C]//Proceedings of ACL.2015:687-696.
[18]XIAO H,HUANG M,HAO Y,et al.TransA:An adaptive ap-proach for knowledge graph embedding[J].arXiv:1509.05490,2015.
[19]XIAO H,HUANG M,HAO Y,et al.TransG:A generativemixture model for knowledge graph embedding[J].arXiv:1509.05488,2015.
[20]XIE R,LIU Z,JIA J,et al.Representation learning of knowledge graphs with entity descriptions[C]//Proceedings of 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Phoenix:AAAI Press,2016:2659-2665.
[21]XIE R,LIU Z,SUN M.Representation Learning of Knowledge Graphs with Hierarchical Types[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.New York:AAAI Press,2016:2965-2971.
[22]TANG X,CHEN L,CUI J,et al.Knowledge representationlearning with entity descriptions,hierarchical types,and textual relations[J].Information Processing & Management,2019,56(3):809-822.
[23]LIN Y,LIU Z,SUN M.Knowledge Representation Learningwith Entities,Attributes and Relations[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Menlo Park:AAAI Press,2016:2866-2872.
[24]ZHANG Z,CAO L,CHEN X,et al.Representation Learning of Knowledge Graphs With Entity Attributes[J].IEEE Access,2020,8:7435-7441.
[25]LIN Y,LIU Z,SUN M.Modeling Relation Paths for Representation Learning of Knowledge Bases [J].arXiv:1506.00379,2015.
[26]SEO S,OH B,LEE K H.Reliable Knowledge Graph Path Representation Learning[J].IEEE Access,2020,8:32816-32825.
[27]SUN Z,HU W,LI C.Cross-lingual entity alignment via joint attribute-preserving embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 16th Int Semantic Web Conference.Cham:Springer International Publishing,2017:628-644.
[1] SONG Jie, LIANG Mei-yu, XUE Zhe, DU Jun-ping, KOU Fei-fei. Scientific Paper Heterogeneous Graph Node Representation Learning Method Based onUnsupervised Clustering Level [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 64-69.
[2] HUANG Li, ZHU Yan, LI Chun-ping. Author’s Academic Behavior Prediction Based on Heterogeneous Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 76-82.
[3] XU Yong-xin, ZHAO Jun-feng, WANG Ya-sha, XIE Bing, YANG Kai. Temporal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 162-171.
[4] LI Zong-min, ZHANG Yu-peng, LIU Yu-jie, LI Hua. Deformable Graph Convolutional Networks Based Point Cloud Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 273-278.
[5] HUANG Pu, DU Xu-ran, SHEN Yang-yang, YANG Zhang-jing. Face Recognition Based on Locality Regularized Double Linear Reconstruction Representation [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 407-411.
[6] JIANG Zong-li, FAN Ke, ZHANG Jin-li. Generative Adversarial Network and Meta-path Based Heterogeneous Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(1): 133-139.
[7] WANG Ying-li, JIANG Cong-cong, FENG Xiao-nian, QIAN Tie-yun. Time Aware Point-of-interest Recommendation [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(9): 43-49.
[8] ZHAO Jin-long, ZHAO Zhong-ying. Recommendation Algorithm Based on Heterogeneous Information Network Embedding and Attention Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(8): 72-79.
[9] YE Hong-liang, ZHU Wan-ning, HONG Lei. Music Style Transfer Method with Human Voice Based on CQT and Mel-spectrum [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 326-330.
[10] QIAN Sheng-sheng, ZHANG Tian-zhu, XU Chang-sheng. Survey of Multimedia Social Events Analysis [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(3): 97-112.
[11] WANG Xing , KANG Zhao. Smooth Representation-based Semi-supervised Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(3): 124-129.
[12] WANG Xue-cen, ZHANG Yu, LIU Ying-jie, YU Ge. Evaluation of Quality of Interaction in Online Learning Based on Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(2): 207-211.
[13] LI Xin-chao, LI Pei-feng, ZHU Qiao-ming. Directed Network Representation Method Based on Hierarchical Structure Information [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(2): 100-104.
[14] FU Kun, ZHAO Xiao-meng, FU Zi-tong, GAO Jin-hui, MA Hao-ran. Deep Network Representation Learning Method on Incomplete Information Networks [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(12): 212-218.
[15] KANG Yan, KOU Yong-qi, XIE Si-yu, WANG Fei, ZHANG Lan, WU Zhi-wei, LI Hao. Deep Clustering Model Based on Fusion Variational Graph Attention Self-encoder [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 81-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!