Computer Science ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11A): 241200012-7.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.241200012

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Knowledge Graph Completion Model Based on Multi-semantic Extraction

LI Pengyan, WANG Baohui   

  1. School of Software,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China
  • Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-10

Abstract: In the field of knowledge graph completion,the rich multi-semantic information between entities and relationships is of great significance for improving the accuracy of completion tasks.However,existing models often struggle to fully capture and integrate these multi-semantic features,which limits the effectiveness of completion.To address this challenge,this paper proposes a Knowledge Graph Completion Model Based on Multi-Semantic Extraction(MSE).Firstly,a multi-semantic aggregation encoder is designed to dimensionally split entity and relationship embeddings,integrating the multi-semantic information of neighboring entities and relationships.Secondly,a decoder based on multi-scale convolution is proposed,using convolutional kernels of different sizes to extract the deep semantic features of entities.Lastly,a loss function with independence constraints is designed,introducing a regularization term based on Pearson correlation coefficients to enhance the model’s multi-semantic expression capability.The experimental results show that on the FB15k-237 and WN18RR datasets,the MRR values of the MSE model are improved by 1.7% and 2.3%,respectively,compared with the optimal models of other baselines,which verifies its effectiveness on the knowledge graph complementation task.

Key words: Knowledge graph, Knowledge completion, Multi-semantic information, Independence constraint

CLC Number: 

  • TP301
[1]BORDES A,USUNIER N,GARCIA-DURAN A,et al.Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2013,26.
[2]WANG Z,ZHANG J,FENG J,et al.Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2014.
[3]LIN Y,LIU Z,SUN M,et al.Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2015.
[4]JI G,HE S,XU L,et al.Knowledge graph embedding via dyna-mic mapping matrix[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Mee-ting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing(volume 1:Long papers).2015:687-696.
[5]NICKEL M,TRESP V,KRIEGELH P.A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data[C]//ICML.2011:3104482-3104584.
[6]YANG B,YIH W,HE X,et al.Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases[J].arXiv:1412.6575,2014.
[7]TROUILLON T,WELBL J,RIEDEL S,et al.Complex embeddings for simple link prediction[C]//International Conference on Machine Learning.PMLR,2016:2071-2080.
[8]BALAŽEVIĆ I,ALLEN C,HOSPEDALES T M.Tucker:Tensor factorization for knowledge graph completion[J].arXiv:1901.09590,2019.
[9]DETTMERS T,MINERVINI P,STENETORP P,et al.Convolutional 2d knowledge graph embeddings[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2018.
[10]VASHISHTH S,SANYAL S,NITIN V,et al.Interacte:Improving convolution-based knowledge graph embeddings by increa-sing feature interactions[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Confe-rence on Artificial Intelligence.2020:3009-3016.
[11]NGUYEN D Q,NGUYEN T D,NGUYEN D Q,et al.A novel embedding model for knowledge base completion based on convo-lutional neural network[J].arXiv:1712.02121,2017.
[12]NGUYEN D Q,VU T,NGUYEN T D,et al.A capsule network-based embedding model for knowledge graph completion and search personalization[J].arXiv:1808.04122,2018.
[13]YANG X,WANG N.A confidence-aware and path-enhancedconvolutional neural network embedding framework on noisy knowledge graph[J].Neurocomputing,2023,545:126261.
[14]GORI M,MONFARDINI G,SCARSELLI F.A new model for learning in graph domains[C]//2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.IEEE,2005,729-734.
[15]WU B,LIANG X,ZHANG S S,et al.Advances and Applications in Graph Neural Network[J].Chinese Journal of Compu-ters,2022,45(1):35-68.
[16]SCHLICHTKRULL M,KIPF T N,BLOEM P,et al.Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks[C]//The Semantic Web:15th International Conference(ESWC 2018).Heraklion,Crete,Greece,Springer International Publishing,2018:593-607.
[17]SHANG C,TANG Y,HUANG J,et al.End-to-end structure-aware convolutional networks for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2019:3060-3067.
[18]JIN Y,YANG L.Graph-aware tensor factorization convolutional network for knowledge graph completion[J].International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics,2024,15(5):1755-1766.
[19]VASHISHTH S,SANYAL S,NITIN V,et al.Composition-based multi-relational graph convolutional networks[J].arXiv:1911.03082,2019.
[20]NATHANI D,CHAUHAN J,SHARMA C,et al.Learning attention-based embeddings for relation prediction in knowledge graphs[J].arXiv:1906.01195,2019.
[21]DONG B,BU C,WANG Y,et al.Disentangled Multi-viewGraph Neural Network for multilingual knowledge graph completion[J].Applied Soft Computing,2025,183:113605.
[22]TOUTANOVA K,CHEN D.Observed versus latent featuresfor knowledge base and text inference[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and Their Compositionality.2015:57-66.
[1] CAI Qihang, XU Bin, DONG Xiaodi. Knowledge Graph Completion Model Using Semantically Enhanced Prompts and Structural Information [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(9): 282-293.
[2] WANG Dongsheng. Multi-defendant Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-turn LLM and Criminal Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(8): 308-316.
[3] HONG Xinran, MA Jun, WANG Jing, ZHANG Chuang, YU Jie, LI Xiaoling, ZHANG Xueyan, YANG Yajing. Survey on Research of Compatibility Issues in Operating System for Software Ecology Evolution [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 1-12.
[4] LUO Xuyang, TAN Zhiyi. Knowledge-aware Graph Refinement Network for Recommendation [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 103-109.
[5] ZHENG Xinxin, CHEN Fan, SUN Baodan, GONG Jianguang, JIANG Junhui. Question Answering System for Soybean Planting Management Based on Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240500025-8.
[6] HU Xin, DUAN Jiangli, HUANG Denan. Concept Cognition for Knowledge Graphs by Mining Double Granularity Concept Characteristics [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240800047-6.
[7] LI Pengyan, WANG Baohui, YE Zihao. Study on Improvements of RippleNet Model Based on Representation Enhancement [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240800142-9.
[8] HAN Daojun, LI Yunsong, ZHANG Juntao, WANG Zemin. Knowledge Graph Completion Method Fusing Entity Descriptions and Topological Structure [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(5): 260-269.
[9] LU Haiyang, LIU Xianhui, HOU Wenlong. Negative Sampling Method for Fusing Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(3): 161-168.
[10] SONG Baoyan, LIU Hangsheng, SHAN Xiaohuan, LI Su, CHEN Ze. Joint Relational Patterns and Analogy Transfer Knowledge Graph Completion Method [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(3): 287-294.
[11] WEI Qianqiang, ZHAO Shuliang, ZHANG Siman. Multi-hop Knowledge Base Question Answering Based on Differentiable Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(3): 295-305.
[12] LI Zhikang, DENG Yichen, YU Dunhui, XIAO Kui. Relationship and Attribute Aware Entity Alignment Based on Variant-attention [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(11): 230-236.
[13] CAI Ruixiang, ZHAO Shuliang, HE Jiayao. Commonsense Question Answering Model Based on Graph-Text Integrating [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(11): 237-244.
[14] ZENG Zefan, HU Xingchen, CHENG Qing, SI Yuehang, LIU Zhong. Survey of Research on Knowledge Graph Based on Pre-trained Language Models [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(1): 1-33.
[15] CHENG Zhiyu, CHEN Xinglin, WANG Jing, ZHOU Zhongyuan, ZHANG Zhizheng. Retrieval-augmented Generative Intelligence Question Answering Technology Based on Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(1): 87-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!