Computer Science ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 144-150.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.201100056

• Database & Big Data & Data Science • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mechanism Design of Right to Earnings of Data Utilization Based on Evolutionary Game Model

SHANG Xi-xue1, HAN Hai-ting2, ZHU Zheng-zhou3   

  1. 1 School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China
    2 Department of Food and Resource Economics,University of Copenhagen,Copenhagen 1958,Denmark
    3 School of Software and Microelectronic,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China
  • Received:2020-11-06 Revised:2020-11-30 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-05
  • About author:SHANG Xi-xue,born in 1987,Ph.D,assistant professor.Her main research interests include legal protection for personal data,regulation approach to digi-tal economy.
    HAN Hai-ting,born in 1993,Ph.D,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include economic design,computational sociology,data governance and data market infrastructures based on DLT and smart contracts.
  • Supported by:
    Carlsberg Foundation (CF18-1112) and China University of Political Science and Law Annual Project of Scientific Research and Innovation for Young Scholar(20ZFQ82007).

Abstract: In order to solve the problemsin the process of marketization of data elements,such as the difficulty of complete deli-very of data,the difficulty of fair division of data property rights,and thesuperiority of enterprises in the game between indivi-duals and enterprises,this paper proposes the concept of data utilization to get rid of the restriction of traditional property rights concept,andmakes the trading system better adapt to the general characteristics ofthe data market.At the same time,the evolutionary game analysis of economics is used to transform the direct distribution of data revenue into rational individual and enterprise mutual trial and error,and to explore the group advantage strategies that tend to converge under different conditions,so as to realize the fairness of distribution and the “Kaldor-Hicks efficiency”.Finally,the weight formula of the proportionality principle injustice is introduced to make the judicial trial computable,programmable and controllable.Algorithm analysis and si-mulation experiments prove that the game framework can well realize market equilibrium under realistic conditions,and find the convergence characteristics and convergence speeds under different Wij conditions,providing an important quantitative analysis tool for judicial practice.

Key words: Computational law, Evolution game, Mechanism design, Proportionality principle, Robert alexy, Usufruct of data exploitation

CLC Number: 

  • TP301.6
[1]WING J M.Computational thinking[J].Communications of the ACM,2006,49(3):33-35.
[2]LOEVINGERL.Jurimetrics--The Next Step Forward[J].Minn.L.Rev.,1948,33:455.
[3]SEIPEL P.Computing law:perspectives on a new legal discipline[D].Stockholm:LiberFörlag,1977.
[4]LOVE N,GENESERETH M.Computational law[C]//Procee-dings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law.2005:205-209.
[5]HAN H H,YUAN L L.Study on Data Capitalization in the Digi-tal Economy [J].Credit Reference,2019,37(4):72-78.
[6]YE Y Z,LIU G H,ZHU Y Y.Two-step Authorization Pattern of Data Product Circulation[J].Computer Science,2021,48(1):119-124.
[7]WEIBULL J W.Evolutionary game theory[M].MIT Press,1997.
[8]WANG Y Z,YU J Y,QU W,et al.Evolutionary game model and analysis methods for network group behavior[J].Chinese Journal of Computers,2015,38(2):282-300.
[9]TANG D Z,MA W F.Research on Compensation System of Urban House RemovalBased on Evolutionary Game Theory[J].Finance and Trade Research,2007(6):25-28,66.
[10]LI C F,ZHANG L Y.Interest Conflict of River Basin Ecological Compensation Based on Evolutionary Game Theory[J].China Population Resource and Environment,2014,24(1):171-176.
[11]XING H L,GAO C Y.Research on Dynamic Evolutionary Game Model of Data Resource Sharing among Big Data Alliance Members:Based on the Perspective of Sharing Positivity[J].Management Review,2020,32(8):155-165.
[12]TU S B.Research on the possibility and Limit of Mathematical Expression in Law:Based on economics and Proportionality Principle [J].Law Review,2020(4):37-50.
[13]LI G Q.Conceptualization of Ownership:A Historical Character of Ownership in Modern Private Law [J].Modern Law Science,2009(4):20-28.
[14]KERBER W.A new (intellectual) property right for non-personal data? An economic analysis[J].Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht,Internationaler Teil (GRUR Int),2016,11:989-999.
[15]CAO J F,ZHU L H.Preliminary Study on European Data Pro-perty Rights [J].Information Security and Communications Privacy,2018(7):30-38.
[16]WILKINS R G.Defining the reasonable expectation of privacy:an emerging tripartite analysis[J].Vand.L.Rev.,1987,40:1077.
[17]KITCH E W.KATZ V.United States:The Limits of the Fourth Amendment[J].The Supreme Court Review,1968,1968:133-152.
[18]ZHU J J.The legal enlightenment of the country’s first big data product unfair competition dispute[N].People’s Court News,2018-09-26 (007).
[19]HANG X B.‘General Free Mode + Specific Payment Mode’:A New Thinking on Personal Information Protection [J].Journal of Comparative Law,2018(5):1-15.
[20]PENG C X.From legal Principle to Case Norm — Civil Law Application of Alexi Principle Theory [J].Chinese Journal of Law,2014 (4):92-113.
[21]ALEXY R.Institutionalized reason:the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2012.
[22]STRINGHAME P.Kaldor-Hicks efficiency and the problem of central planning[J].Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics,2001,4(2):41-50.
[1] DU Hui, LI Zhuo, CHEN Xin. Incentive Mechanism for Hierarchical Federated Learning Based on Online Double Auction [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(3): 23-30.
[2] . [J]. Computer Science, 2007, 34(3): 44-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!