Computer Science ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (11): 185-196.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.211100063

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Methods of Patent Knowledge Graph Construction

DENG Liang1,2,3, CAO Cun-gen4   

  1. 1 School of Computer Science and Technology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
    2 Shenyang Institute of Computing Technology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang 110168,China
    3 Patent Office,China National Intellectual Property Administration,Beijing 100083,China
    4 Institute of Computing Technology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China
  • Received:2021-11-05 Revised:2022-03-11 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-11-03
  • About author:DENG Liang,born in 1980,postgra-duate.His main research interests include deep learning and knowledge graph.
    CAO Cun-gen,born in 1964,Ph.D,professor,Ph.D supervisor,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include large-scale knowledge process and so on.

Abstract: Patent knowledge graph plays a important role in patent accurate retrieval,patent in-depth analysis and patent know-ledge training.This paper proposes a practical patent knowledge graph construction method based on seed knowledge graph,text mining and relationship completion.In this method,to ensure the quality,a seed patent knowledge graph is first established ma-nually,then the concept and relation extraction method of patent text pattern is used to expand the seed patent knowledge graph,and finally the extended patent knowledge graph is quantitatively evaluated.In this paper,artificial extraction of seed knowledge and manual summarization of lexical and syntactic patterns are carried out for patents in the field of traditional Chinese medicine.After obtaining new lexical and syntactic patterns by machine learning,the knowledge graph of seed patent is expanded and completed.Experimental results show that the number of nodes and relationships in the knowledge graph of traditional Chinese medicine are 19 453 and 194 775 respectively.After expansion,they reach 558 461 and 7 275 958 respectively,representing an increase of 27.7 and 36.3 folds respectively.

Key words: Patent text, Patent knowledge graph, Lexical and syntactic analysis, Representation learning

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]WIPO.World Intellectual Property Indicators 2021[R].Geneva:WIPO,2021.
[2]XU C L.Research method and application of technology development based on patent knowledge graph[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology,2017.
[3]XU J.Research on anti-liver cancer drug development trend in China based on knowledge graph and patent map[J].Medical Information,2018,31(21):19-23.
[4]SUN D.Research on patent measurement and knowledge graph in cloud computing field[J].Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy,2018,3(6):35-41.
[5]ZHANG Y,PAN H Q,LIN H G.Research on patent information of radix pseudostellariae based on scientific konwledge graph[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2019,47(6):234-239.
[6]GAO S Y.Knowledge graph of Mongolian medicine patent in China:Citespace based metrological analysis[J].Inner Mongolia Science technology&Economy,2020(4):96-101.
[7]ZHANG P L.Design and implementation of patent recommendation system based on knowledge graph[D].Jinan:Shandong University,2019.
[8]SERHAD S,LUO J X,KRISTIN L.Technology Knowledge Graph Based on Patent Data[J].arXiv:1906.00411,2019.
[9]JI S X,PAN S R,ERIK C,et al.A Survey on Knowledge Graphs:Representation,Acquisition and Applications[J].ar-Xiv:2002.00388,2020.
[10]ZHANG N Y,DENG S M,SUN Z L,et al.Long-tail Relation Extraction via Knowledge Graph Embeddings and Graph Convolution Networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies,Volume 1(Long and Short Papers).2019:3016-3025.
[11]NAYYERI M,CIL G M,VAHDATI S,et al.Link Prediction of Weighted Triples for Knowledge Graph Completion Within the Scholarly Domain[J].IEEE Access,2021,8:79521-79540.
[12]YAN C,SU Q,WANG J.MoGCN:Mixture of Gated Convolutional Neural Network for Named Entity Recognition of Chinese Historical Texts[J].IEEE Access,2020,8:181629-181639.
[13]YAN Z,PENG R,WANG Y,et al.CTEA:Context and Topic Enhanced Entity Alignment for Knowledge Graphs[J].Neurocomputing,2020,410(3):155-165.
[14]CHRISTINA L,THOMAS L,PATRICIA S,et al.Is buttercup a kind of cup? Hyponymy and semantic transparency in compound words[J].Journal of Memory,2020,113:104110.
[15]CHEN S D,OUYANG X Y.A review of named entity recognition technology[J].Radio Communications Technology,2020,46(3):251-260.
[16]YU T,CUI M,LI H Y,et al.Application research of ISO technical specification "Semantic Network of Chinese Medicine Language System"[J].China Medical Herald,2016,13(4):89-92.
[17]JI G L,HE S J,XU L H,et al.Knowledge Graph Embedding via Dynamic Mapping Matrix[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.Association for Computational Linguistics,2015:687-696.
[1] SONG Jie, LIANG Mei-yu, XUE Zhe, DU Jun-ping, KOU Fei-fei. Scientific Paper Heterogeneous Graph Node Representation Learning Method Based onUnsupervised Clustering Level [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 64-69.
[2] HUANG Li, ZHU Yan, LI Chun-ping. Author’s Academic Behavior Prediction Based on Heterogeneous Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 76-82.
[3] XU Yong-xin, ZHAO Jun-feng, WANG Ya-sha, XIE Bing, YANG Kai. Temporal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 162-171.
[4] LI Zong-min, ZHANG Yu-peng, LIU Yu-jie, LI Hua. Deformable Graph Convolutional Networks Based Point Cloud Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 273-278.
[5] HUANG Pu, DU Xu-ran, SHEN Yang-yang, YANG Zhang-jing. Face Recognition Based on Locality Regularized Double Linear Reconstruction Representation [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 407-411.
[6] FU Kun, GUO Yun-peng, ZHUO Jia-ming, LI Jia-ning, LIU Qi. Semantic Information Enhanced Network Embedding with Completely Imbalanced Labels [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(11): 109-116.
[7] JIANG Zong-li, FAN Ke, ZHANG Jin-li. Generative Adversarial Network and Meta-path Based Heterogeneous Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(1): 133-139.
[8] WANG Ying-li, JIANG Cong-cong, FENG Xiao-nian, QIAN Tie-yun. Time Aware Point-of-interest Recommendation [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(9): 43-49.
[9] ZHAO Jin-long, ZHAO Zhong-ying. Recommendation Algorithm Based on Heterogeneous Information Network Embedding and Attention Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(8): 72-79.
[10] YE Hong-liang, ZHU Wan-ning, HONG Lei. Music Style Transfer Method with Human Voice Based on CQT and Mel-spectrum [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 326-330.
[11] YANG Ru-han, DAI Yi-ru, WANG Jian, DONG Jin. Humans-Cyber-Physical Ontology Fusion of Industry Based on Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(5): 190-196.
[12] QIAN Sheng-sheng, ZHANG Tian-zhu, XU Chang-sheng. Survey of Multimedia Social Events Analysis [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(3): 97-112.
[13] WANG Xing , KANG Zhao. Smooth Representation-based Semi-supervised Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(3): 124-129.
[14] LI Xin-chao, LI Pei-feng, ZHU Qiao-ming. Directed Network Representation Method Based on Hierarchical Structure Information [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(2): 100-104.
[15] WANG Xue-cen, ZHANG Yu, LIU Ying-jie, YU Ge. Evaluation of Quality of Interaction in Online Learning Based on Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(2): 207-211.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!