Computer Science

Computer Science ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 330-336.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.240300162

• Information Security • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Security Risk Relation Extraction Based on Multi-view IB

LI Xiwang1, CAO Peisong1, WU Yuying1, GUO Shuming2,3, SHE Wei1,2   

  1. 1 School of Cyber Science and Engineering,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,China
    2 Songshan Laboratory,Zhengzhou 450000,China
    3 National Digital Switching System Engineering & Technological R&D Center,Zhengzhou 450000,China
  • Received:2024-03-25 Revised:2024-08-16 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-12
  • About author:LI Xiwang,born in 1999,postgraduate.His main research interests include relation extraction and data mining.
    SHE Wei,born in 1977,Ph.D,professor.His main research interests include complex system modeling and simulation,machine learning and intelligent systems,information security and blockchain technology.
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(31703-3) and Songshan Laboratory Pre-research Project(YYYY022022003).

PDF (PC)

107

Abstract: Safety risk management is the core assignment to ensure safety,and the traditional methods of identifying safety risks can no longer meet the needs of intelligent development.Research on relation extraction is of significant importance for security risk management,as it serves as one of the methods for identifying security risks.However,most existing relation extraction models ignore the problem of insufficient representation of domain entity and contain more noise in the data.To address the above problems,a multi-view IB-based safety risk relation extraction model(MIBRE) is proposed.Specifically,it achieves enhanced domain entity semantics by fusing semantic information from multi-view.In order to obtain the maximum relevant information between the two views,an objective function is constructed using the information bottleneck approach.The relevant information is maximally preserved and restored while compressing the information between the two views.Experiments on two real domain datasets show that the F1 value recognized by MIBRE reaches 64.28% and 74.34% respectively,which is 4.41% and 2.98% higher than that of LGGCN based on heterogeneous graph model.Compared with TDGAT based on attention mechanism model,F1 value increased by 1.89% and 1.53% respectively.The effectiveness of the proposed model in security risk identification is verified by experiments.

Key words: Relation extraction, Information bottleneck, Multi-view, Safety risk, Feature fusion

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]SHANG B,ZHAO Y,LIU J.Learnable convolutional attention network for knowledge graph completion[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2024,285:111360.
[2]SOUSA R T,SILVA S,PESQUITA C.Explaining protein-protein interactions with knowledge graph-based semantic similarity[J].Computers in Biology and Medicine,2024,170:108076.
[3]CHEN J,HU J,LI T,et al.An effective relation-first detection model for relational triple extraction[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2024,238:122007.
[4]LAI T,JI H,ZHAI C,et al.Tran,Joint biomedical entity and relation extraction with knowledge-enhanced collective inference[C]//Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2021:6248-6260.
[5]CHEN J,HU B,PENG W,et al.Biomedical relation extraction via knowledge-enhanced reading comprehension[J].BMC Bioinformtics,2022,23:20.
[6]PÉREZ-PÉREZ M,FERREIRA T,IGREJAS G,et al.A deep learning relation extraction approach to support a biomedical semi-automatic curation task:The case of the gluten bibliome[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2022,195:116616.
[7]ROY S,PACHECO M,GOLDWASSER D.Identifying morality frames in political tweets using relational learning[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2021:9939-9958.
[8]ZHAO D,WANG J,LIN H,et al.Biomedical cross-sentence relation extraction via multihead attention and graph convolutional networks[J].Applied Soft Computing,2021,104:107230.
[9]HILLEBRAND L,DEUßER T,KHAMENEH T,et al.KPI-BERT:A joint named entity recognition and relation extraction model for financial reports [C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition(ICPR).2022:606-612.
[10]ZENG D,LIU K,LAI S,et al.Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network[C]//Proceedings of the Confe-rence 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.Dublin,Ireland,2014:2335-2344.
[11]YANG C,XIAO D,LUO Y,et al.A hybrid method based on semi-supervised learning for relation extraction in Chinese emrs[J].BMC Medical Informatics Decis Mak,2022,22:169.
[12]WU R,YAO Y,HAN X,et al.Open relation extraction:Relational knowledge transfer from supervised data to unsupervised data[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2019:219-228.
[13]MINTZ M,BILLS S,SNOW R,et al.Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data[C]//Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Singapore,2009:1003-1011.
[14]SOCHER R,HUVAL B,MANNING C,et al.,Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces[C]//Procee-dings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing & Computational Natural Language Learning.2012:1201-1211.
[15]ZENG D,LIU K,LAI S,et al.Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics.2014:2335-2344.
[16]SUN H B,LI S X,TONG W Y,et al.Construction of Knowledge Graph of Power Communication Planning based on Deep Learning[C]//Proceedings of the 6th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference.2022:843-851.
[17]XU Y,MOU L,GE L,et al.Classifying relations via long short term memory networks along shortest dependency paths[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:1785-1794.
[18]WU T,YOU X,XIAN X,et al.Towards deep understanding of graph convolutional networks for relation extraction [J].Data &Knowledge Engineering,2024,149:102265.
[19]ZHUANG L,FEI H,HU P.Knowledge-enhanced event relation extraction via event ontology prompt[J].Information Fusion,2023,100:101919.
[20]TISHBY N,PEREIRA F,BIALEK W.The information bottleneck method[C]//Proceedings of the 37th Annual Allerton Conference on Communnication Control Computing.1999:368-377.
[21]CUI S,CAO J,CONG X,et al.Enhancing multimodal entity and relation extraction with variational information bottleneck[J].IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio,Speech,and Language Processing,2024,32,1274-1285.
[22]LI X,EISNER J.Specializing word embeddings(for parsing) by information bottleneck[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2019:2744-2754.
[23]AMJAD R,GEIGER B.Learning representations for neural net-work-based classification using the information bottleneck principle[J].IEEE Trans.Pattern Anal.Mach.Intell.,2020,42:2225-2239.
[24]HUANG W,MAO Y,YANG L,et al.Local-to-global GCN withknowledge-aware representation for distantly supervised relation extraction[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2021,234:107565.
[25]SUN Q,ZHANG K,HUANG K,et al.Document-level relation extraction with two-stage dynamic graph attention networks[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2023,267:110428.
[26]XU S,SUN S,ZHANG Z,et al.BERT gatedmulti-window attention network for relation extraction[J].Neurocomputing,2022,492:516-529.
[27]LIN Y,SHEN S,LIU Z,et al.Neural relation extraction with selective attention over instances[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(Volume 1:Long Papers).2016:2124-2133.
[28]ZHAO Q,GAO T,GUO N.A novel chinese relation extraction method using polysemy rethinking mechanism[J].Applied Intelligence,2023,53(7):7665-7676.
[29]BUSST M M A,ANBANANTHEN K S M,KANNAN S,et al.Ensemble BiLSTM:A Novel Approach for Aspect Extraction From Online Text[J].IEEE Access,2024,12:3528-3539.
[30]YU M,CHEN Y,ZHAO M,et al.Semantic piecewise convolutional neural network with adaptive negative training for distantly supervisedrelation extraction[J].Neurocomputing,2023,537:12-21.
[31]WU M,ZHANG Q,WU C,et al.End-to-end multi-granulation causality extraction model[J].Digital Communications and Networks,2023,10(6):1864-1873.
[1] LUO Chi, LU Lingyun, LIU Fei. Partial Differential Equation Solving Method Based on Locally Enhanced Fourier NeuralOperators [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(9): 144-151.
[2] GUO Husheng, ZHANG Xufei, SUN Yujie, WANG Wenjian. Continuously Evolution Streaming Graph Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(8): 118-126.
[3] LIU Le, XIAO Rong, YANG Xiao. Application of Decoupled Knowledge Distillation Method in Document-level RelationExtraction [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(8): 277-287.
[4] WANG Jinfu, WANG Siwei, LIANG Weixuan, YU Shengju, ZHU En. Multi-view Clustering Based on Bipartite Graph Cross-view Graph Diffusion [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 69-74.
[5] LUO Xuyang, TAN Zhiyi. Knowledge-aware Graph Refinement Network for Recommendation [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 103-109.
[6] LIU Chengzhuang, ZHAI Sulan, LIU Haiqing, WANG Kunpeng. Weakly-aligned RGBT Salient Object Detection Based on Multi-modal Feature Alignment [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 142-150.
[7] XU Yongwei, REN Haopan, WANG Pengfei. Object Detection Algorithm Based on YOLOv8 Enhancement and Its Application Norms [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 189-200.
[8] FANG Chunying, HE Yuankun, WU Anxin. Emotion Recognition Based on Brain Network Connectivity and EEG Microstates [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 201-209.
[9] SHI Xincheng, WANG Baohui, YU Litao, DU Hui. Study on Segmentation Algorithm of Lower Limb Bone Anatomical Structure Based on 3D CTImages [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240500119-9.
[10] LI Weirong, YIN Jibin. FB-TimesNet:An Improved Multimodal Emotion Recognition Method Based on TimesNet [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240900046-8.
[11] XU Yutao, TANG Shouguo. Visual Question Answering Integrating Visual Common Sense Features and Gated Counting Module [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240800086-7.
[12] WANG Rui, TANG Zhanjun. Multi-feature Fusion and Ensemble Learning-based Wind Turbine Blade Defect Detection Method [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240900138-8.
[13] LI Mingjie, HU Yi, YI Zhengming. Flame Image Enhancement with Few Samples Based on Style Weight Modulation Technique [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240500129-7.
[14] WANG Rong , ZOU Shuping, HAO Pengfei, GUO Jiawei, SHU Peng. Sand Dust Image Enhancement Method Based on Multi-cascaded Attention Interaction [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240800048-7.
[15] JIN Lu, LIU Mingkun, ZHANG Chunhong, CHEN Kefei, LUO Yaqiong, LI Bo. Pedestrian Re-identification Based on Spatial Transformation and Multi-scale Feature Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240800156-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
渝ICP备16013121号-4
Add:18# Honghu West Rd., Yubei ,Chongqing,China    Post Code: 401121
Tel: 023-63500828/023-67039612/023-67039623
E-mail: jsjkx12@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.