Computer Science ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 278-284.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250100046

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Bidirectional Prompt-Tuning for Event Argument Extraction with Topic and Entity Embeddings

CHEN Qian1, CHENG Kaixuan1, GUO Xin1, ZHANG Xiaoxia2, WANG Suge1, LI Yanhong1   

  1. 1 School of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
    2 Wuhan Institute of Design and Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2025-01-09 Revised:2025-04-28 Online:2026-01-15 Published:2026-01-08
  • About author:CHEN Qian,born in 1983,Ph.D,professor,is a member of CCF(No.E200048750M).His main research interests include information extraction and natural language processing.
    GUO Xin,born in 1983,Ph.D,professor.Her main research interest is data mining.
  • Supported by:
    Basic Research Project of Shanxi Province(202203021221021,202203021221001,202303021211021,20210302123468) and National Natural Science Foundation of China(62376143).

Abstract: In recent years,prompt learning has been widely applied in the field of natural language processing.According to research,argument roles are highly semantically related to topics in text,and existing prompt tuning methods overlook entity information and interactions between arguments.Therefore,this paper proposes a bidirectional prompt tuning event argument extraction model(TEPEAE) that integrates topic and entity embeddings.Firstly,topic features are extracted using a topic model and embedded into a topic representation.Secondly,prompt templates are constructed based on trigger words,arguments,and entity information,incorporating topic embeddings into the template.Thirdly,masked language model(MLM) is utilized to predict the role label for each entity.Finally,labels are mapped from the label word space to the argument role space.Experiments on ACE2005-EN and ERE-EN datasets show that TEPEAE outperforms baseline models and achieves 79.53% and 78.60% in terms of F1,respectively,which demonstrates the effectiveness of TEPEAE.Moreover,it continues to demonstrate exceptional performance in low-resource scenarios,further proving its enhanced robustness.

Key words: Prompt learning, Event argument extraction, Entity embedding, Topic embedding, Attention mechanism

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]HU R J,ZHOU H,LIU H,et al.Survey on Document-LevelEvent Extraction Based on Deep Learning[J].Computer Engineering and Applications,2022,58(24):47-60.
[2]WADDEN D,WENNBERG U,LUAN Y,et al.Entity,relation,and event extraction with contextualized span representations[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2019:5783-5788.
[3]PAOLINI G,ATHIWARATKUN B,KRONE J,et al.Structured prediction as translation between augmented natural languages[J].arXiv:2101.05779,2021.
[4]WANG X,WANG Z,HAN X,et al.HMEAE:Hierarchicalmodular event argument extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2019:5777-5783.
[5]LU Y,LIN H,XU J,et al.Text2Event:Controllable sequence-to-structure generation for end-to-end event extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2021:2795-2806.
[6]CUI J M,LI D M,TIAN X,et al.Survey on Prompt Learning[J].Computer Engineering and Applications,2024,60(23):1-27.
[7]MA Y,WANG Z,CAO Y,et al.Prompt for extraction? PAIE:Prompting argument interaction for event argument extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2022:6759-6774.
[8]LIN Y,JI H,HUANG F,et al.A joint neural model for information extraction with global features[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2020:7999-8009.
[9]DU X,CARDIE C.Event extraction by answering(almost) na-tural questions[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2020:671-683.
[10]LI F,PENG W,CHEN Y,et al.Event extraction as multi-turn question answering[C]//Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2020:829-838.
[11]LI S,JI H,HAN J.Document-level event argument extractionby conditional generation[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 Confe-rence of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2021:894-908.
[12]HSU H,HUANG K H,BOSCHEE E,et al. Degree:A data-efficient generative event extraction model[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2022:1890-1908.
[13]HE Y,HU J,TANG B.Revisiting event argument extraction:can EAE models learn better when being aware of event co-occurrences?[C]//Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2023:12542-12556.
[14]HSU I H,XIE Z,HUANG K H,et al.AMPERE:AMR-Aware Prefix for Generation-Based Event Argument Extraction Model[C]//Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2023:10976-10993.
[15]DAI L,WANG B,XIANG W,et al.Bidirectional iterativeprompt-tuning for event argument extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2022:6251-6263.
[16]DEVLIN J,CHANG M W,LEE K,et al. BERT:Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2019:4171-4186.
[17]LIU Y,OTT M,GOYAL N,et al.Roberta:A robustly opti-mized bert pretraining approach[J].arXiv:1907.116 92,2019.
[18]MENG Z,LIU T,ZHANG H,et al.CEAN:Contrastive event aggregation network with LLM-based augmentation for event extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2024:321-333.
[19]YANG Y,GUO J Y,SHUANG K,et al.Scented-EAE:Stage-Customized Entity Type Embedding for Event Argument Extraction[C]//Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2024:5222-5235.
[1] LI Zongmin, WANG Li, LI Yachuan, LIU Yujie, RONG Guangcai, LIU Weihan, MA Wenkang. High-accuracy Human Pose Estimation Combining Wavelet Analysis and Frequency-DomainAttention [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(5): 228-236.
[2] CHEN Boying, SHI Jie. Continuous Image Super-resolution Based on Self-attention Implicit Feature Encoding andDecoding [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(5): 237-246.
[3] LIU Dehua, YU Saixuan, QIAO Jinlan, HUANG Heqing, CHENG Wenhui. Denoising Diffusion Model-enhanced Algorithm for Battery Swap Demand Data Generation [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(4): 163-172.
[4] PENG Juhong, ZHANG Zhengyue, DING Zixu, FAN Xinyu, HU Changyu, ZHAO Mingjun. Multi-view Local Language Feature and Global Feature Fusion for Conversational Aspect-based Sentiment Quadruple Analysis [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(4): 384-392.
[5] ZHENG Cheng, BAN Qingqing. Knowledge-assisted and Reinforced Syntax-driven for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(4): 406-414.
[6] QIAN Qing, CHEN Huicheng, CUI Yunhe, TANG Ruixue, FU Jinmei. Joint Entity and Relation Extraction Method with Multi-scale Collaborative Aggregation and Axial-semantic Guidance [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(3): 97-106.
[7] GE Zeqing, HUANG Shengjun. Semi-supervised Learning Method for Multi-label Tabular Data [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(3): 151-157.
[8] WANG Xinyu, GAO Donghuai, NING Yuwen, XU Hao, QI Haonan. Student Behavior Detection Method Based on Improved YOLO Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(3): 246-256.
[9] CHEN Lin, MA Longxuan, ZHANG Yongbing, HUANG Yuxin, GAO Shengxiang, YU Zhengtao. Industrial Text Classification for Chinese and Vietnamese Based on Prompt Learning and AdaptiveLoss Weighting [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 312-321.
[10] CHANG Xuanwei, DUAN Liguo, CHEN Jiahao, CUI Juanjuan, LI Aiping. Method for Span-level Sentiment Triplet Extraction by Deeply Integrating Syntactic and Semantic
Features
[J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 322-330.
[11] ZHANG Jing, PAN Jinghao, JIANG Wenchao. Background Structure-aware Few-shot Knowledge Graph Completion [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 331-341.
[12] ZHUO Tienong, YING Di, ZHAO Hui. Research on Student Classroom Concentration Integrating Cross-modal Attention and Role
Interaction
[J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 67-77.
[13] XU Jingtao, YANG Yan, JIANG Yongquan. Time-Frequency Attention Based Model for Time Series Anomaly Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 161-169.
[14] HAN Lei, SHANG Haoyu, QIAN Xiaoyan, GU Yan, LIU Qingsong, WANG Chuang. Constrained Multi-loss Video Anomaly Detection with Dual-branch Feature Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 236-244.
[15] GUO Xingxing, XIAO Yannan, WEN Peizhi, XU Zhi, HUANG Wenming. Attention-based Audio-driven Digital Face Video Generation Method [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 245-252.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!