Computer Science ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6A): 230800136-7.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.230800136

• Image Processing & Multimedia Technolog • Previous Articles     Next Articles

SAR Image Target Recognition Based on Cross Domain Few Shot Learning

SHI Songhao, WANG Xiaodan, YANG Chunxiao, WANG Yifei   

  1. College of Air and Missile Defense,Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710051,China
  • Published:2024-06-06
  • About author:SHI Songhao,born in 1994,postgra-duate.His main research interests include few shot learning,target recognition,etc.
    WANG Xiaodan,born in 1966,Ph.D,professor,Ph.D supervisor.Her main research interests include intelligent information processing and target recognition.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(61876189,61703426,61806219).

Abstract: Due to the difficulty in acquiring SAR images and the scarce number of samples available for research,solving the SAR image target recognition problem under few shot conditions has become a community-recognized challenge.With the development of deep learning in the field of computer vision,a variety of few-shot image classification methods have been derived,so a cross-domain few-shot learning paradigm is considered to solve the few-shot SAR image target recognition problem.Concretely,the feature extractors of different domains are first trained inmultiple source domains,while a generalized feature extractor is obtained by knowledge distillation.In this stage,the central kernet alignment method is used to map the extracted features to a higher dimensional space,so as to better distinguish the nonlinear similarity between the original features.Then the target domain image features are extracted by the generalized feature extractor obtained in the previous stage.Finally,a prototype network approach to predict the class of the sample.The experiment proves that the method obtains 88.61% accuracy while reducing the model parameters,which provides a new method for solving the target recognition problem of SAR images with scarce samples.

Key words: Deep learning, Meta learning, Cross domain few shot learning, SAR image target recognition, Knowledge distillation

CLC Number: 

  • TP18
[1]YING Z L,WANG W Q,XU Y,et al.Twin Self-SupervisedLearning Method for Small Sample SAR Images Automatic Target Recognition[J/OL].Signal Processing:1-13.[2023-07-13].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2406.TN.20230321.1926.010.html.
[2]FENG B D,YANG H T,WANG J N,et al.SAR Image TargetRecognition Algorithm Based on Data Fusion[J].Computer System Applications,2022,31(12):342-349.
[3]WANG Y Y.SAR TargetRecognition Based on Modified Sparse Representation[J/OL].Electronics Optics & Control:1-7.[2023-08-21].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/41.1227.TN.20230727.1127.004.html.
[4]KANG Z Q,ZHANG S Q,FENG S J,et al.Sparse Prior-Guided CNN Learning for SAR Images Target Recognition[J].Journal Of Signal Processing,2023,39(4):737-750.
[5]TANG H,LI Z,PENG Z,et al.Blockmix:meta regularization and self-calibrated inference for metric-based meta-learning[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia.2020:610-618.
[6]ANTONIOU A,EDWARDS H,STORKEY A.How to trainyour MAML[J].arXiv:1810.09502,2018.
[7]SUNG F,YANG Y,ZHANG L,et al.Learning to compare:Relation network for few-shot learning[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2018:1199-1208.
[8]XIE Y,FU Y,TAI Y,et al.Learning To Memorize Feature Hallucination for One-Shot Image Generation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2022:9130-9139.
[9]SCHROEDER B,CUI Y.Fgvcx fungi classification challenge 2018[J/OL].http://github.com/visipedia/fgvcx_fungi_comp.
[10]FINN C,ABBEEL P,LEVINE S.Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks[C]//International Confe-rence on Machine Learning.PMLR,2017:1126-1135.
[11]SNELL J,SWERSKY K,ZEMEL R.Prototypical networks for few-shot learning[C]//Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2017:4080-4090.
[12]CHEN W Y,LIU Y C,KIRA Z,et al.A closer look at few-shotclassification[J].arXiv:1904.04232,2019.
[13]REQUEIMA J,GORDON J,BRONSKILL J,et al.Fast andflexible multi-task classification using conditional neural adaptive processes[C]//Proceedings of 33rd International Confe-rence onNeural Information Processing Systems.2019:7959-7970.
[14]BATENI P,GOYAL R,MASRANI V,et al.Improved few-shot visual classification[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confe-rence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2020:14493-14502.
[15]PEREZ E,STRUB F,DE VRIES H,et al.Film:Visual reaso-ning with a general conditioning layer[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2018.
[16]DVORNIK N,SCHMID C,MAIRAL J.Selecting relevant features from a multi-domain representation for few-shot classification[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2020:16th European Confe-rence,Glasgow,UK,Part X 16.Springer International Publi-shing,2020:769-786.
[17]LIU L,HAMILTON W,LONG G,et al.A universal representation transformer layer for few-shot image classification[J].ar-Xiv:2006.11702,2020.
[18]PHOO C P,HARIHARAN B.Self-training for few-shot transfer across extreme task differences[J].arXiv:2010.07734,2020.
[19]FU Y,XIE Y,FU Y,et al.Me-d2n:Multi-expert domain decompositional network for cross-domain few-shot learning[C]//Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia.2022:6609-6617.
[20]LI W H,LIU X,BILEN H.Universal representation learningfrom multiple domains for few-shot classification[C]//Procee-dings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision.2021:9526-9535.
[21]GUO Y,CODELLA N C,KARLINSKY L,et al.A broaderstudy of cross-domain few-shot learning[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2020:16th European Conference,Glasgow,UK,Part XXVII 16.Springer International Publishing,2020:124-141.
[22]YANG Y,ZHU W G,QIU L L,et al.A Survey of Research on the Target Recognition via Limited SAR Sample Based on Transfer Learning.[J/OL].Electronics Optics & Control:1-8.[2023-07-13].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/41.1227.TN.20230327.1159.002.html.
[23]CHEN W Y,LIU Y C,KIRA Z,et al.A closer look at few-shotclassification[J].arXiv:1904.04232,2019.
[24]KENDALL A,GAL Y,CIPOLLA R.Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2018:7482-7491.
[25]ZACARIAS A,ALEXANDRE L A.Sena-cnn:Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in convolutional neural networks by selective network augmentation[C]//IAPR Workshop on Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition.Cham:Springer International Publishing,2018:102-112.
[26]ROY D,PANDA P,ROY K.Tree-CNN:a hierarchical deep convolutional neural network for incremental learning[J].Neural Networks,2020,121:148-160.
[27]XU H,ZHI S,SUN S,et al.Deep Learning for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Visual Recognition:A Survey[J].arXiv:2303.08557,2023.
[28]HINTON G,VINYALS O,DEAN J.Distilling the knowledge in a neural network[J].arXiv:1503.02531,2015.
[29]ROMERO A,BALLAS N,KAHOU S E,et al.Fitnets:Hintsfor thin deep nets[J].arXiv:1412.6550,2014.
[30]LI W H,BILEN H.Knowledge distillation for multi-task lear-ning[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2020 Workshops:Glasgow,UK,Part VI 16.Springer International Publishing,2020:163-176.
[31]KORNBLITH S,NOROUZI M,LEE H,et al.Similarity of neural network representations revisited[C]//International Confe-rence on Machine Learning.PMLR,2019:3519-3529.
[32]NGUYEN T,RAGHU M,KORNBLITH S.Do wide and deep networks learn the same things? uncovering how neural network representations vary with width and depth[J].arXiv:2010.15327,2020.
[33]TRIANTAFILLOU E,ZHU T,DUMOULIN V,et al.Meta-dataset:A dataset of datasets for learning to learn from few examples[J].arXiv:1903.03096,2019.
[34]RUSSAKOVSKY O,DENG J,SU H,et al.Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge[J].International Journal of Computer Vision,2015,115:211-252.
[35]LAKE B M,SALAKHUTDINOV R,TENENBAUM J B.Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction[J].Science,2015,350(6266):1332-1338.
[36]MAJI S,RAHTU E,KANNALA J,et al.Fine-grained visualclassification of aircraft[J].arXiv:1306.5151,2013.
[37]WAH C,BRANSON S,WELINDER P,et al.The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset[J/OL].https://www.docin.com/p-1472255882.html.
[38]CIMPOI M,MAJI S,KOKKINOS I,et al.Describing textures in the wild[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2014:3606-3613.
[39]JONGEJAN J,ROWLEY H,KAWASHIMA T,et al.The quick,draw!-AI experiment[J].Mount View,2016,17(2018):4.
[40]HOUBEN S,STALLKAMP J,SALMEN J,et al.Detection of traffic signs in real-world images:The German Traffic Sign Detection Benchmark[C]//The 2013 International Joint Confe-rence on Neural Networks(IJCNN).IEEE,2013:1-8.
[41]LIN T Y,MAIRE M,BELONGIE S,et al.Microsoft coco:Common objects in context[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2014:13th European Conference,Zurich,Switzerland,Part V 13.Springer International Publishing,2014:740-755.
[1] HUANG Haixin, CAI Mingqi, WANG Yuyao. Review of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation Based on Graph Convolutional Neural Networks [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230400196-7.
[2] TAN Zhiwen, XU Ruzhi, WANG Naiyu, LUO Dan. Differential Privacy Federated Learning Method Based on Knowledge Distillation [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230600002-8.
[3] WANG Li, CHEN Gang, XIA Mingshan, HU Hao. DUWe:Dynamic Unknown Word Embedding Approach for Web Anomaly Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230300191-5.
[4] WANG Yingjie, ZHANG Chengye, BAI Fengbo, WANG Zumin. Named Entity Recognition Approach of Judicial Documents Based on Transformer [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230500164-9.
[5] LIANG Fang, XU Xuyao, ZHAO Kailong, ZHAO Xuanfeng, ZHANG Guijun. Remote Template Detection Algorithm and Its Application in Protein Structure Prediction [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230600225-7.
[6] PENG Bo, LI Yaodong, GONG Xianfu, LI Hao. Method for Entity Relation Extraction Based on Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks and TextSemantic Enhancement [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230700071-5.
[7] ZHANG Tianchi, LIU Yuxuan. Research Progress of Underwater Image Processing Based on Deep Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230400107-12.
[8] WANG Guogang, DONG Zhihao. Lightweight Image Semantic Segmentation Based on Attention Mechanism and Densely AdjacentPrediction [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230300204-8.
[9] LYU Yiming, WANG Jiyang. Iron Ore Image Classification Method Based on Improved Efficientnetv2 [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230600212-6.
[10] YANG Xiuzhang, WU Shuai, REN Tianshu, LIAO Wenjing, XIANG Meiyu, YU Xiaomin, LIU Jianyi, CHEN Dengjian. Complex Environment License Plate Recognition Algorithm Based on Improved Image Enhancement and CNN [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 220200162-7.
[11] SONG Zhen, WANG Jiqiang, HOU Moyu, ZHAO Lin. Conveyor Belt Defect Detection Network Combining Attention Mechanism with Line Laser Assistance [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230800115-6.
[12] WU Chunming, LIU Yali. Method for Lung Nodule Detection on CT Images Using Improved YOLOv5 [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230500019-6.
[13] YIN Xudong, CHEN Junyang, ZHOU Bo. Study on Industrial Defect Augmentation Data Filtering Based on OOD Scores [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230700111-7.
[14] QIAO Hong, XING Hongjie. Attention-based Multi-scale Distillation Anomaly Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230300223-11.
[15] SI Jia, LIANG Jianfeng, XIE Shuo, DENG Yingjun. Research Progress of Anomaly Detection in IaaS Cloud Operation Driven by Deep Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230400016-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!