Computer Science ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6A): 784-789.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.210400030

• Interdiscipline & Application • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Life Prediction of IGBT Devices Based on Stacking Multi-model Fusion

WANG Fei, HUANG Tao, YANG Ye   

  1. School of Information and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China
    Shanghai Intelligent Education Big Data Engineering Technology Research Center of Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China
  • Online:2022-06-10 Published:2022-06-08
  • About author:WANG Fei,born in 1997,postgraduate,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include machine learning and semiconductor device.
    YANG Ye,born in 1985,Ph.D,professor,is a member of China Computer Federation.Her main research interests include machine learning and microelectronics.
  • Supported by:
    Young Scientists Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51605298) and China Scholarship Council.

Abstract: Insulated gate bipolar transistor(IGBT) device is a kind of core technology component which is widely used in industry,communication,computer,automotive electronics,and other fields.It is very important to improve the safety of the device.Recently,the prediction of the life of IGBT devices by machine learning has become a hot research issue.However,the common neural network prediction still has problems of long training time and low accuracy.In order to solve these problems,a machine learning model based on Stacking multi-model fusion is proposed to realize IGBT life prediction.The model effectively improves the accuracy and efficiency of prediction.The algorithm consists of a two-layer structure,which incorporates four complementary machine learning algorithm models.In the first layer,the mild gradient lift tree model(LGBM),extreme gradient lift tree model(XGBoost),and ridge regression model are used to predict the IGBT life,and then the prediction results are input into the second layer for training.The second layer uses a linear regression model and the final IGBT life is predicted by the two-layer model training.Through the comparison of experimental data,it is confirmed that the machine learning model based on Stacking multi-model fusion is superior to the commonly used long and short-term memory neural network(LSTM) algorithm model,its MSE of IGBT life prediction is 93% lower than that of the LSTM algorithm model.What's more,the average time of model training is reduced to 13% of the LSTM algorithm model.

Key words: IGBT device, Life prediction, Long short-term memory, Machine learning, Stacking algorithm

CLC Number: 

  • TP183
[1] BALIGA B J.IGBT devices-physics,design and applications[M].Beijing Machinery Industry Press,2018.
[2] CHEN B,LU G,FANG H Z,et al.IGBT health parameter prediction method based on degenerate data and DBN algorithm[J].Computer Measurement and Control,2017,25(5):71-75.
[3] SMET V,FOREST F,HUSELSTEIN J J,et al.Ageing andFailure Modes of IGBT Modules in High-Temperature Power Cycling[J].IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,2011,58(10):4931-4941.
[4] ALGHASSI A,PERINPANAYAGAM S,SAMIE M.Stochastic RUL Calculation Enhanced With TDNN-Based IGBT Failure Modeling[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2016,65(2):558-573.
[5] LI M,ZHU J J,LONG B.Particle Filter Approach for IGBT Remaining Useful Life[J].AMR,2014,981:86-89.
[6] WU H W,YE C J,ZHANG Y T,et al.Remaining Useful Life Prediction of an IGBT Module in Electric Vehicles Statistical Analysis[J].Symmetry,2020,12(8):1325.
[7] ADLA I,LOTFI S.A New Data-Driven Approach for Power IGBT Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based On Feature Reduction Technique and Neural Network[J].Electronics,2020,9(10):1571.
[8] AHSAN M,HON T S,BATUNLU C,et al.Reliability Assessment of IGBT Through Modelling and Experimental Testing[J].IEEE Access,2020,8:39561-39573.
[9] LU G Z.Research on Life Prediction Technology of IGBTPower Module[D].Chongqing:Chongqing University,2012.
[10] DU X,LI G X,LIU H J,et al.The Influence of Wind Speed Probability Distribution on the Life of Power Devices in Wind Power Converters[J].Journal of Electrotechnical Technology,2015,30(15):109-117.
[11] THEBAUD J,WORIGARD E.Strategy for designing accele-rated aging tests to evaluate IGBT power modules lifetime in real operation mode[J].IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies,2003,26(2):429-438.
[12] LIU B L,LIU D Z,TANG Y,et al.Life prediction and failureanalysis of IGBT module based on accelerated life test[J].Journal of Jiangsu University,2013,34(5):556-563.
[13] WANG X C,ZHAO J J.Research on IGBT lifetime based on wavelet neural network[J].Electrotechnical,2020(10):114-116.
[14] HAN G G.Research on IGBT fault prediction based on deep learning[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2019.
[15] SHI Y Z,GUO B,ZHENG Y J.Research on IGBT lifetime prediction based on LSTM network[J/OL].China Test.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1714.TB.20200810.1312.006.html.
[16] LIU H,LANG B.Machine learning and deep learning methods for intrusion detection systems:A survey[J].Applied Sciences,2019,9(20):4396.
[17] YANG R X,SUN C Y,XU L.Prediction of photovoltaic power generation based on stacking model fusion[J].Computer System Application,2020,29(5):36-45.
[18] KE G L.Lightgbm:A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2017,30:3146-3154.
[19] CHEN T,GUESTRIN C.XGBoost:A Scalable Tree Boosting System [C]//Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.San Francisco,California,USA,Association for Computing Machinery,2016:785-94.
[20] MARQUARDT D W,SNEE R D.Ridge Regression in Practice[J].The American Statistician,1975,29(1):3-20.
[21] HUANG H,MAWBY P A.A Lifetime Estimation Technique for Voltage Source Inverters[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,2013,28(8):4113-4119.
[22] CELAYA J,WYSOCKI P,GOBEL K.IGBT accelerated aging data set[J/OL].NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository,2009.https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/#igbt.
[23] SONNENFELD G,KAI G,CELAYA J R,et al.An agile acce-lerated aging,characterization and scenario simulation system for gate controlled power transistors[J].IEEE Autotestcon,2008,6:208-215.
[1] LENG Dian-dian, DU Peng, CHEN Jian-ting, XIANG Yang. Automated Container Terminal Oriented Travel Time Estimation of AGV [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 208-214.
[2] NING Han-yang, MA Miao, YANG Bo, LIU Shi-chang. Research Progress and Analysis on Intelligent Cryptology [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 288-296.
[3] HE Qiang, YIN Zhen-yu, HUANG Min, WANG Xing-wei, WANG Yuan-tian, CUI Shuo, ZHAO Yong. Survey of Influence Analysis of Evolutionary Network Based on Big Data [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 1-11.
[4] LI Yao, LI Tao, LI Qi-fan, LIANG Jia-rui, Ibegbu Nnamdi JULIAN, CHEN Jun-jie, GUO Hao. Construction and Multi-feature Fusion Classification Research Based on Multi-scale Sparse Brain Functional Hyper-network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 257-266.
[5] WANG Xin-tong, WANG Xuan, SUN Zhi-xin. Network Traffic Anomaly Detection Method Based on Multi-scale Memory Residual Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 314-322.
[6] ZHANG Guang-hua, GAO Tian-jiao, CHEN Zhen-guo, YU Nai-wen. Study on Malware Classification Based on N-Gram Static Analysis Technology [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 336-343.
[7] CHEN Ming-xin, ZHANG Jun-bo, LI Tian-rui. Survey on Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 310-323.
[8] KANG Yan, XU Yu-long, KOU Yong-qi, XIE Si-yu, YANG Xue-kun, LI Hao. Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction Based on Transformer and LSTM [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 17-21.
[9] LI Ya-ru, ZHANG Yu-lai, WANG Jia-chen. Survey on Bayesian Optimization Methods for Hyper-parameter Tuning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 86-92.
[10] ZHAO Lu, YUAN Li-ming, HAO Kun. Review of Multi-instance Learning Algorithms [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 93-99.
[11] WANG Shan, XU Chu-yi, SHI Chun-xiang, ZHANG Ying. Study on Cloud Classification Method of Satellite Cloud Images Based on CNN-LSTM [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 675-679.
[12] XIAO Zhi-hong, HAN Ye-tong, ZOU Yong-pan. Study on Activity Recognition Based on Multi-source Data and Logical Reasoning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 397-406.
[13] YAO Ye, ZHU Yi-an, QIAN Liang, JIA Yao, ZHANG Li-xiang, LIU Rui-liang. Android Malware Detection Method Based on Heterogeneous Model Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 508-515.
[14] XU Jie, ZHU Yu-kun, XING Chun-xiao. Application of Machine Learning in Financial Asset Pricing:A Review [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6): 276-286.
[15] LI Ye, CHEN Song-can. Physics-informed Neural Networks:Recent Advances and Prospects [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(4): 254-262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!