Computer Science ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 110-115.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.210200173
Special Issue: Big Data & Data Scinece
• Database & Big Data & Data Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO He-xin1, ZHAO Liang2, LI Xue-feng1
CLC Number:
[1] LBAIK C,JAGADISH H V,LI Y Y.Bridging the semantic gap with SQL query logs in natural language interfaces to databases[J].arXiv:1902.00031,2019. [2] WU Z,PAN S,CHEN F,et al.A Comprehensive Survey onGraph Neural Networks[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems,2020(99):1-21. [3] ANDROUTSOPOULOS I,RITCHIE G D,THANISCH P.Na-tural Language Interfaces to Databases-An Introduction[J].Natural Language Engineering,1995,1(1):29-81. [4] POPESCU A M, ARMANASU A, ETZIONI O,et al.Modern natural language interfaces to databases:Composing statistical parsing with semantic tractability[C]//COLING.2004. [5] UNGER C,BÜHMANN L,LEHMANN J,et al.Template- based question answering over RDF data[C]//Proceedings of the 21st World Wide Web Conference.New York:ACM,2012:639-648. [6] LI F,JAGADISH H V.Constructing an interactive natural language interface for relational databases[J].Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment,2014,8(1):73-84. [7] ZHONG V,XIONG C,SOCHER R.Seq2SQL:GeneratingStructured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learning[J].arXiv:1709.0010.3v7. [8] YU T,LI Z F,ZHANG Z L,et al.TypeSQL:Knowledge-Based Type-Aware Neural Text-to-SQL Generation[J].arXiv:1804.09769v1,2018. [9] YU T,MICHIHIRO Y,KAI Y,et al.SyntaxSQLNet:Syntax Tree Networks for Complex and Cross-DomainText-to-SQL Task[J].arXiv:1810.05237v1,2018. [10] YU T,ZHANG R,YANG K,et al.Spider:A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task [J].arXiv:1809.08887v5,2019. [11] CAO J C,HUANG T,CHEN G,et al.Research on Natural Language Generating Multi-table SQL Query Statement Technology[J].Journal of Computer Science and Research,2020(7):1133-1141. [12] ZHANG R,YU T,ER H Y,et al.Editing-Based SQL QueryGeneration for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent Questions[C]//Proceedings of the2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP).2019. [13] BOGIN B, GARDNER M, BERANT J.Representing Schema Structure with Graph Neural Networks for Text-to-SQL Parsing[J].arXiv:1905,06241v2,2019. [14] BOGIN B,GARDNER M,BERANT J.Global Reasoning overDatabase Structures for Text-to-SQL Parsing[J].arXiv:1908.11214v1,2019. [15] XIE J X,GAN Y J,YU G J.Design and Implementation of Algorithms for Converting SQL Query Statements into Graph Structures[J].Electromechanical Information,2020(17):120-123. [16] GUO J,ZHAN Z,GAO Y,et al.Towards Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representation[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2019. [17] ASHISH V, NOAM S, NIKI P,et al.Attention is All YouNeed[J].arXiv:1706.03762. [18] KIPF T N,WELLING M.Variational Graph Auto-Encoders[J].arXiv:1611.07308v1. [19] YUAN Z X,REN D D,HONG X D,et al.Research on Question Understanding Method Combining Database Structure and Content[J].Computer Engineering,2021,47(3):71-76,82. |
[1] | ZHOU Fang-quan, CHENG Wei-qing. Sequence Recommendation Based on Global Enhanced Graph Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 55-63. |
[2] | XU Yong-xin, ZHAO Jun-feng, WANG Ya-sha, XIE Bing, YANG Kai. Temporal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 162-171. |
[3] | RAO Zhi-shuang, JIA Zhen, ZHANG Fan, LI Tian-rui. Key-Value Relational Memory Networks for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 202-207. |
[4] | TANG Ling-tao, WANG Di, ZHANG Lu-fei, LIU Sheng-yun. Federated Learning Scheme Based on Secure Multi-party Computation and Differential Privacy [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 297-305. |
[5] | SUN Qi, JI Gen-lin, ZHANG Jie. Non-local Attention Based Generative Adversarial Network for Video Abnormal Event Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 172-177. |
[6] | YAN Jia-dan, JIA Cai-yan. Text Classification Method Based on Information Fusion of Dual-graph Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 230-236. |
[7] | WANG Jian, PENG Yu-qi, ZHAO Yu-fei, YANG Jian. Survey of Social Network Public Opinion Information Extraction Based on Deep Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 279-293. |
[8] | HAO Zhi-rong, CHEN Long, HUANG Jia-cheng. Class Discriminative Universal Adversarial Attack for Text Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 323-329. |
[9] | JIANG Meng-han, LI Shao-mei, ZHENG Hong-hao, ZHANG Jian-peng. Rumor Detection Model Based on Improved Position Embedding [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 330-335. |
[10] | QI Xiu-xiu, WANG Jia-hao, LI Wen-xiong, ZHOU Fan. Fusion Algorithm for Matrix Completion Prediction Based on Probabilistic Meta-learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 18-24. |
[11] | YANG Bing-xin, GUO Yan-rong, HAO Shi-jie, Hong Ri-chang. Application of Graph Neural Network Based on Data Augmentation and Model Ensemble in Depression Recognition [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 57-63. |
[12] | HU Yan-yu, ZHAO Long, DONG Xiang-jun. Two-stage Deep Feature Selection Extraction Algorithm for Cancer Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 73-78. |
[13] | CHENG Cheng, JIANG Ai-lian. Real-time Semantic Segmentation Method Based on Multi-path Feature Extraction [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 120-126. |
[14] | HOU Yu-tao, ABULIZI Abudukelimu, ABUDUKELIMU Halidanmu. Advances in Chinese Pre-training Models [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 148-163. |
[15] | ZHOU Hui, SHI Hao-chen, TU Yao-feng, HUANG Sheng-jun. Robust Deep Neural Network Learning Based on Active Sampling [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 164-169. |
|