基于物理信息的神经网络:最新进展与展望

doi:10.11896/jsjkx.210500158

Abstract

Abstract: Physical-informed neural networks (PINN) are a class of neural networks used to solve supervised learning tasks.They not only try to follow the distribution law of the training data, but also follow the physical laws described by partial diffe-rential equations.Compared with pure data-driven neural networks, PINN imposes physical information constraints during the training process, so that more generalized models can be acquired with fewer training data.In recent years, PINN has gradually become a research hotspot in the interdisciplinary field of machine learning and computational mathematics, and has obtained relatively in-depth research in both theory and application, and has made considerable progress.However, due to the unique network structure of PINN, there are some problems such as slow training or even non-convergence and low precision in practical application.On the basis of summarizing the current research of PINN, this paper explores the network/system design and its application in many fields such as fluid mechanics, and looks forward to the further research directions.

Key words: Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Neural network, Partial differential equations, Physical model

CLC Number:

TP183

LI Ye, CHEN Song-can. Physics-informed Neural Networks:Recent Advances and Prospects[J].Computer Science, 2022, 49(4): 254-262.

References

[1] KRIZHEVSKY A,SUTSKEVER I,HINTON G E.ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J].Communications of the ACM,2017,60(6):84-90.
[2] LI H.Deep learning for natural language processing:advantages and challenges[J].National Science Review,2018,5(1):24-26.
[3] LAKE B M,SALAKHUTDINOV R,TENENBAUM J B.Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction[J].Science,2015,350(6266):1332-1338.
[4] ALIPANAHI B,DELONG A,WEIRAUCH M T,et al.Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning[J].Nature Biotechnology,2015,33(8):831-838.
[5] TEMAM R.Navier-Stokes equations:theory and numericalanalysis[M].American Mathematical Society,2001.
[6] TAFLOVE A,HAGNESS S C.Computational electrodynamics:the finite-difference time-domain method[M].Artech House,2005.
[7] BEREZIN F A,SHUBIN M.The Schrödinger Equation[M].Springer Science & Business Media,2012.
[8] AMES W F.Numerical methods for partial differential equations[M].Academic Press,2014.
[9] LAGARIS I E,LIKAS A,FOTIADIS D I.Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,1998,9(5):987-1000.
[10] PSICHOGIOS D C,UNGAR L H.A hybrid neural network-first principles approach to process modeling[J].AIChE Jour-nal,1992,38(10):1499-1511.
[11] LAGARIS I E,LIKAS A C,PAPAGEORGIOU D G.Neural-network methods for boundary value problems with irregular boundaries[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,2000,11(5):1041-1049.
[12] RAISSI M,PERDIKARIS P,KARNIADAKIS G E.Physics informed deep learning (part I):Data-driven solutions of nonli-near partial diffe-rential equations[J].arXiv:1711.10561,2017.
[13] RAISSI M,PERDIKARIS P,KARNIADAKIS G E.Physics informed deep learning (part II):Data-driven discovery of nonli-near partial differential equations[J].arXiv:1711.10566,2017.
[14] RAISSI M,PERDIKARIS P,KARNIADAKIS G E.Physics-informed neural networks:A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J].Journal of Computational Physics,2019,378:686-707.
[15] BAKER N,ALEXANDER F,BREMER T,et al.Workshop report on basic research needs for scientific machine learning:Core technologies for artificial intelligence[R].USDOE Office of Science (SC),Washington,DC(United States),2019.
[16] BAYDIN A G,PEARLMUTTER B A,RADUL A A,et al.Automatic differentiation in machine learning:a survey[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2018,18:1-43.
[17] LU L,MENG X,MAO Z,et al.DeepXDE:A deep learning library for solving differential equations[J].SIAM Review,2021,63(1):208-228.
[18] WANG J X,WU J,LING J,et al.A comprehensive physics-informed machine learning framework for predictive turbulence modeling[J].arXiv:1701.07102,2017.
[19] ZHU Y,ZABARAS N.Bayesian deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification[J].Journal of Computational Physics,2018,366:415-447.
[20] HAGGE T,STINIS P,YEUNG E,et al.Solving differentialequations with unknown constitutive relations as recurrent neural networks[J].arXiv:1710.02242,2017.
[21] HAN J,JENTZEN A,WEINAN E.Solving high-dimensionalpartial differential equations using deep learning[J].Procee-dings of the National Academy of Sciences,2018,115(34):8505-8510.
[22] TRIPATHY R K,BILIONIS I.Deep UQ:Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification[J].Journal of Computational Physics,2018,375:565-588.
[23] VLACHAS P R,BYEON W,WAN Z Y,et al.Data-driven forecasting of high-dimensional chaotic systems with long short-term memory networks[J/OL].Proceedings of the Royal Society A:Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences,2018,474(2213).https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0844.
[24] PARISH E J,DURAISAMY K.A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning[J].Journal of Computational Physics,2016,305:758-774.
[25] DURAISAMY K,ZHANG Z J,SINGH A P.New approaches in turbulence and transition modeling using data-driven techniques[C]//53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.Kissimmee,Florida,2015:1284.
[26] LING J,KURZAWSKI A,TEMPLETON J.Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2016,807:155-166.
[27] ZHANG Z J,DURAISAMY K.Machine learning methods for data-driven turbulence modeling[C/OL]//22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference.2015:2460.
[28] MILANO M,KOUMOUTSAKOS P.Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow[J].Journal of Computational Phy-sics,2002,182(1):1-26.
[29] PERDIKARIS P,VENTURI D,KARNIADAKIS G E.Multifidelity information fusion algorithms for high-dimensional systems and massive data sets[J].SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing,2016,38(4):B521-B538.
[30] RICO-MARTINEZ R,ANDERSON J S,KEVREKIDIS I G.Continuous-time nonlinear signal processing:a neural network based approach for gray box identification[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing.IEEE,1994:596-605.
[31] LING J,TEMPLETON J.Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of regions of high Reynolds averaged Na-vier-Stokes uncertainty[J/OL].Physics of Fluids,2015,27(8).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927765.
[32] YANG X,ZAFAR S,WANG J X,et al.Predictive large-eddy-simulation wall modeling via physics-informed neural networks[J/OL].Physical Review Fluids,2019,4(3).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.034602.
[33] PANG G,D’ELIA M,PARKS M,et al.nPINNs:nonlocal Phy-sics-Informed Neural Networks for a parametrized nonlocal universal Laplacian operator.Algorithms and Applications[J/OL].Journal of Computational Physics,2020,422.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109760.
[34] PANG G,LU L,KARNIADAKIS G E.fPINNs:Fractionalphysics-informed neural networks[J].SIAM Journal on Scien-tific Computing,2019,41(4):A2603-A2626.
[35] SONG F,PANGE G,MENEVEAU C,et al.Fractional physical-inform neural networks (fPINNs) for turbulent flows[C]//Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics.2019:23-26.
[36] MENG X,LI Z,ZHANG D,et al.PPINN:Parareal physics-informed neural network for time-dependent PDEs[J/OL].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,370.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113250.
[37] JAGTAP A D,KHARAZMI E,KARNIADAKIS G E.Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws:applications to forward and inverse problems[J/OL].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,365.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113028.
[38] DWIVEDI V,PARASHAR N,SRINIVASAN B.Distributedphysics informed neural network for data-efficient solution to partial differential equations[J].arXiv:1907.08967,2019.
[39] YANG L,MENG X,KARNIADAKIS G E.B-PINNs:Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems with noisy data[J/OL].Journal of Computational Physics,2021,425.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109913.
[40] KHARAZMI E,ZHANG Z,KARNIADAKIS G E.Variational physics-informed neural networks for solving partial differential equations[J].arXiv:1912.00873,2019.
[41] JAGTAP A D,KARNIADAKIS G E.Extended physics-in-formed neural networks (XPINNs):a generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonli-near partial differential equations[J].Communications in Computational Physics,2020,28(5):2002-2041.
[42] MISHRA S,MOLINARO R.Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEs[J].arXiv:2006.16144,2020.
[43] MISHRA S,MOLINARO R.Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEs II:a class of inverse problems[J].arXiv:2007.01138,2020.
[44] WANG S,TENG Y,PERDIKARIS P.Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networks[J].arXiv:2001.04536,2020.
[45] WANG S,YU X,PERDIKARIS P.When and why PINNs fail to train:A neural tangent kernel perspective[J].arXiv:2007.14527,2020.
[46] WANG S,WANG H,PERDIKARIS P.On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks:from regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networks[J].arXiv:2012.10047,2020.
[47] JAGTAP A D,KAWAGUCHI K,KARNIADAKIS G E.Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks[J/OL].Journal of Computational Physics,2020,404.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109136.
[48] JAGTAP A D,KAWAGUCHI K,KARNIADAKIS G E.Locally adaptive activation functions with slope recovery for deep and physics-informed neural networks[J/OL].Proceedings of the Royal Society A,2020,476(2239).http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0334. [49] RAISSI M,YAZDANI A,KARNIADAKIS G E.Hidden fluid mechanics:Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visua-lizations[J].Science,2020,367(6481):1026-1030.
[50] JIN X,CAI S,LI H,et al.NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets):Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Na-vier-Stokes equations[J/OL].Journal of Computational Physics,2021,426.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951.
[51] MAO Z,JAGTAP A D,KARNIADAKIS G E.Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows[J/OL].Computer Me-thods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,360.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112789.
[52] GUO H,ZHUANG X,LIANG D,et al.Stochastic groundwater flow analysis in heterogeneous aquifer with modified neural architecture search (NAS) based physics-informed neural networks using transfer learning[J].arXiv:2010.12344,2020.
[53] SAHLI COSTABAL F,YANG Y,PERDIKARIS P,et al.Phy-sics-informed neural networks for cardiac activation mapping[J].Frontiers in Physics,2020,8:42.
[54] FANG Z,ZHAN J.Deep physical informed neural networks for metamaterial design[J].IEEE Access,2019,8:24506-24513.
[55] CHEN Y,LU L,KARNIADAKIS G E,et al.Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in nano-optics and metamaterials[J].Optics express,2020,28(8):11618-11633.
[56] SHUKLA K,DI LEONI P C,BLACKSHIRE J,et al.Physics-informed neural network for ultrasound nondestructive quantification of surface breaking cracks[J].Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation,2020,39(3):1-20.
[57] MISYRIS G S,VENZKE A,CHATZIVASILEIADIS S.Phy-sics-informed neural networks for power systems[C]//2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).IEEE,2020:1-5.
[58] STIASNY J,MISYRIS G S,CHATZIVASILEIADIS S.Physics-informed neural networks for non-linear system identification applied to power system dynamics[J].arXiv:2004.04026,2020.
[59] WANG C,BENTIVEGNA E,ZHOU W,et al.Physics-informed neural network super resolution for advection-diffusion models[J].arXiv:2011.02519,2020.
[60] NASCIMENTO R G,FRICKE K,VIANA F A C.A tutorial on solving ordinary differential equations using Python and hybrid physics-informed neural network[J/OL].Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2020,96.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103996.
[61] HENNIGH O,NARASIMHAN S,NABIAN M A,et al.Anend-to-end AI-driven simulation framework[EB/OL].Workshop:Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences,the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems,2020.https://ml4physicalsciences.github.io/2020/.
[62] HENNIGH O,NARASIMHAN S,NABIAN M A,et al.NVIDIA SimNet^TM:an AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework[C]//International Conference on Computational Science.Cham:Springer,2021:447-461.
[63] YANG L,ZHANG D,KARNIADAKIS G E.Physics-informed generative adversarial networks for stochastic differential equations[J].SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing,2020,42(1):A292-A317.
[64] NABIAN M A,MEIDANI H.A deep neural network surrogate for high-dimensional random partial differential equations[J].arXiv:1806.02957,2018.
[65] ZHANG D,GUO L,KARNIADAKIS G E.Learning in modal space:Solving time-dependent stochastic PDEs using physics-informed neural networks[J].SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing,2020,42(2):A639-A665.
[66] ZHANG D,LU L,GUO L,et al.Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problems[J/OL].Journal of Computational Physics,2019,397.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.07.048.
[67] RAHAMAN N,BARATIN A,ARPIT D,et al.On the spectral bias of neural networks[C]//International Conference on Machine Learning.PMLR,2019:5301-5310.
[68] RONEN B,JACOBS D,KASTEN Y,et al.The convergence rate of neural networks for learned functions of different frequencies[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2019,32:4761-4771.
[69] ZHANG T,DEY B,KAKKAR P,et al.Frequency-compensated PINNs for fluid-dynamic design problems[J].arXiv:2011.01456,2020.
[70] SHIN Y,DARBON J,KARNIADAKIS G E.On the conver-gence and generalization of physics informed neural networks[J].arXiv:2004.01806,2020.
[71] FUKS O,TCHELEPI H A.Limitations of physics informed machine learning for nonlinear two-phase transport in porous media[J].Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing,2020,1(1):19-37.
[72] ZHU Y,ZABARAS N,KOUTSOURELAKIS P S,et al.Phy-sics-constrained deep learning for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification without labeled data[J].Journal of Computational Physics,2019,394:56-81.
[73] RAISSI M,KARNIADAKIS G E.Hidden physics models:Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations[J].Journal of Computational Physics,2018,357:125-141.
[74] RAISSI M.Deep hidden physics models:Deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations[J].The Journal of Machine Learning Research,2018,19(1):932-955.
[75] JACOT A,GABRIEL F,HONGLER C.Neural tangent kernel:convergence and generalization in neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2018:8580-8589.
[76] ARORA S,DU S,HU W,et al.On exact computation with an infinitely wide neural net[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2019:8141-8150.
[77] JI W,QIU W,SHI Z,et al.Stiff-PINN:physics-informed neural network for stiff chemical kinetics[J].arXiv:2011.04520,2020.
[78] WIGHT C L,ZHAO J.Solving Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliardequations using the adaptive physics-informed neural networks[J].arXiv:2007.04542,2020.
[79] MCCLENNY L,BRAGA-NETO U.Self-adaptive physics-in-formed neural networks using a soft attention mechanism[J].arXiv:2009.04544,2020.
[80] YU C C,TANG Y C,LIU B D.An adaptive activation function for multilayer feedforward neural networks[C]//2002 IEEE Region 10 Conference on Computers,Communications,Control and Power Engineering.IEEE,2002,1:645-650.
[81] QIAN S,LIU H,LIU C,et al.Adaptive activation functions in convolutional neural networks[J].Neurocomputing,2018,272:204-212.
[82] ZOBEIRY N,HUMFELD K D.A physics-informed machinelearning approach for solving heat transfer equation in advanced manufacturing and engineering applications[J].arXiv:2010.02011,2020.
[83] ALBER M,TEPOLE A B,CANNON W R,et al.Integratingmachine learning and multiscale modeling-perspectives,challenges,and opportunities in the biological,biomedical,and behavioral sciences[J].NPJ Digital Medicine,2019,2(1):1-11.
[84] PENG G C Y,ALBER M,TEPOLE A B,et al.Multiscale mo-deling meets machine learning:What can we learn?[J].Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering,2020:1-21.
[85] CAI S,MAO Z,WANG et al.Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics:A review[J].arXiv:2105.09506,2021.
[86] ANDERSON J D,WENDT J.Computational fluid dynamics[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1995.
[87] RAISSI M,WANG Z,TRIANTAFYLLOU M S,et al.Deeplearning of vortex induced vibrations[J].arXiv:1808.08952,2018.
[88] SUN L,GAO H,PAN S,et al.Surrogate modeling for fluidflows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data[J/OL].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,361.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732.
[89] WESSELS H,WEIßENFELS C,WRIGGERS P.The neuralparticle method-An updated Lagrangian physics informed ne-ural network for computational fluid dynamics[J/OL].Compu-ter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,368.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113127.
[90] MEHTA P P,PANG G,SONG F,et al.Discovering a universal variable-order fractional model for turbulent Couette flow using a physics-informed neural network[J].Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis,2019,22(6):1675-1688.
[91] TARTAKOVSKY A M,MARRERO C O,PERDIKARIS P,et al.Physics-informed deep neural networks for learning parameters and constitutive relationships in subsurface flow problems [J/OL].Water Resources Research,2020,56(5).https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026731.
[92] HE Q Z,BARAJAS-SOLANO D,TARTAKOVSKY G,et al.Physics-informed neural networks for multiphysics data assimilation with application to subsurface transport[J/OL].Advances in Water Resources,2020,141.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103610.
[93] KISSAS G,YANG Y,HWUANG E,et al.Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling:Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networks[J/OL].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,358.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112623.
[94] LIU D,WANG Y.Multi-fidelity physics-constrained neural net-work and its application in materials modeling[J/OL].Journal of Mechanical Design,2019,141(12).https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044400.
[95] ZHANG E,YIN M,KARNIADAKIS G E.Physics-informedneural networks for nonhomogeneous material identification in elasticity imaging[J].arXiv:2009.04525,2020.
[96] ZHU Q,LIU Z,YAN J.Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing:predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networks[J].Computational Mechanics,2021,67(2):619-635.
[97] DOURADO A,VIANA F A C.Physics-informed neural networks for missing physics estimation in cumulative damage models:a case study in corrosion fatigue[J/OL].Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering,2020,20(6).https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047173.
[98] YUCESAN Y A,VIANA F A C.A physics-informed neural network for wind turbine main bearing fatigue[J].International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management,2020,11(1):17.
[99] GOSWAMI S,ANITESCU C,CHAKRABORTY S,et al.Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture[J/OL].Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics,2020,106.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102447.
[100] TAO F,LIU X,DU H,et al.Physics-informed artificial neural network approach for axial compression buckling analysis of thin-walled cylinder[J].AIAA Journal,2020,58(6):2737-2747.
[101] MISHRA S,MOLINARO R.Physics Informed Neural Net-works for Simulating Radiative Transfer[J].arXiv:2009.13291,2020.
[102] KADEETHUM T,JØRGENSEN T M,NICK H M.Physics-informed neural networks for solving nonlinear diffusivity and Biot’s equations[J/OL].PloS ONE,2020,15(5).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232683.
[103] LIU M,LIANG L,SUN W.A generic physics-informed neural network-based constitutive model for soft biological tissues[J/OL].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,372.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113402.
[104] WANG R,MADDIX D,FALOUTSOS C,et al.Bridging phy-sics-based and data-driven modeling for learning dynamical systems[J].arXiv:2011.10616,2020.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Physics-informed Neural Networks:Recent Advances and Prospects

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHOU Fang-quan, CHENG Wei-qing. Sequence Recommendation Based on Global Enhanced Graph Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 55-63.
[2]	ZHOU Le-yuan, ZHANG Jian-hua, YUAN Tian-tian, CHEN Sheng-yong. Sequence-to-Sequence Chinese Continuous Sign Language Recognition and Translation with Multi- layer Attention Mechanism Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 155-161.
[3]	LENG Dian-dian, DU Peng, CHEN Jian-ting, XIANG Yang. Automated Container Terminal Oriented Travel Time Estimation of AGV [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 208-214.
[4]	NING Han-yang, MA Miao, YANG Bo, LIU Shi-chang. Research Progress and Analysis on Intelligent Cryptology [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 288-296.
[5]	HE Qiang, YIN Zhen-yu, HUANG Min, WANG Xing-wei, WANG Yuan-tian, CUI Shuo, ZHAO Yong. Survey of Influence Analysis of Evolutionary Network Based on Big Data [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 1-11.
[6]	LI Yao, LI Tao, LI Qi-fan, LIANG Jia-rui, Ibegbu Nnamdi JULIAN, CHEN Jun-jie, GUO Hao. Construction and Multi-feature Fusion Classification Research Based on Multi-scale Sparse Brain Functional Hyper-network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 257-266.
[7]	HAO Zhi-rong, CHEN Long, HUANG Jia-cheng. Class Discriminative Universal Adversarial Attack for Text Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 323-329.
[8]	ZHANG Guang-hua, GAO Tian-jiao, CHEN Zhen-guo, YU Nai-wen. Study on Malware Classification Based on N-Gram Static Analysis Technology [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 336-343.
[9]	WANG Run-an, ZOU Zhao-nian. Query Performance Prediction Based on Physical Operation-level Models [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 49-55.
[10]	CHEN Yong-quan, JIANG Ying. Analysis Method of APP User Behavior Based on Convolutional Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 78-85.
[11]	ZHU Cheng-zhang, HUANG Jia-er, XIAO Ya-long, WANG Han, ZOU Bei-ji. Deep Hash Retrieval Algorithm for Medical Images Based on Attention Mechanism [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 113-119.
[12]	YAN Jia-dan, JIA Cai-yan. Text Classification Method Based on Information Fusion of Dual-graph Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 230-236.
[13]	QI Xiu-xiu, WANG Jia-hao, LI Wen-xiong, ZHOU Fan. Fusion Algorithm for Matrix Completion Prediction Based on Probabilistic Meta-learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 18-24.
[14]	YANG Bing-xin, GUO Yan-rong, HAO Shi-jie, Hong Ri-chang. Application of Graph Neural Network Based on Data Augmentation and Model Ensemble in Depression Recognition [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 57-63.
[15]	ZHANG Ying-tao, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Rui, ZHANG Wen-qiang. Photorealistic Style Transfer Guided by Global Information [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 100-105.